A further Sickening of society, the Hyper-Feminization taken to extremes.
Back in the late 1970s and early 1980s Sanity and basic decent human virtues were everywhere. Society of Trust, men and older mothers were always a blessing to those they interacted with and we men were raised to help and serve others that are having problems - if we could.
Summers in HS years were spent working in farm crews and mutual respect was the rule, for a lot of reasons but under it all was the likelihood that someone rude or disrespecting or publicly humiliating another ran the risk of a simple beating, and if female a good slap of face and "F-you and your cnt father for not doing that when you were just starting to be the psychotic putrid walking sack of poison lies and stall vomit is standing there with a bright red cheek .."
[cut for length]
I lived worked studies socialized with men and women in two States in 3 different regions and I never came across pure-evil in human form, until that Dream Job that grew more man-hating abusive toxic as I struggled in a no-win situation being abused, years later I decided the safest response I could do for self-defense and defense of their next young man torture target would have been to shover her down the cement stairwell and stomp of her neck and hope I didn't get caught. Sad the poisonous hyper-empowered demonic horrors in schools, in workplaces, and in public service jobs ..
Every time I hear of a school, workplace, or public shooting I wonder if he killed that Witch an a few of her minions, any owners or managers that knew or even supported the torment that man most likely suffered.
I'm retired and hopefully soon I will die far away from anyone else so my one Bucket-list item will be completed .. to die without killing anyone.
--
Here is a recent letter I sent to someone in my Church that may be of value to you guys.
Subject 1: Key-Log to end this early Stage of Holy Chastisement, world-wide insanity, evil Blindness and un-Righteousness?
Subject 2: Key-Log that reshapes and wins debate against Abortion in both Theological and Scientific forms?
--
Dear ..,
May this note find us all ever closer to God, and His Clarity.
Pardon this uninvited request for your attention and for any kind feed-back from your review of this, my humble Theological and Worldly offering to God, Church, and Man.
The insanities-accepting evil-blindness world-wide Sickness we are suffering from must be address by Moral and Intellectual powerful forces, and God Willing I pray that a version of this may be Championed by the Church and Her Body of Jesus Christ on earth, uniting all of Her and drawing pagan and lost souls to Her and towards Salvation. Tiny effort for our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, impossible with Him.
If this is as valuable as I hope it will be, perhaps your office's effort in reformatting a version to present to the Vatican, with your co-authorship, to finely drive out the 50+ year-old Satanic foothold on earth and in so many souls - the evil Form from Hell Named Abortion, and in making clear to all the world the reason why and how this wide-spread life-Love-Joy-Hope destroying damage has already crippled generations of people across the world. And that is far far too many.
In this Offering I hope to have addressed the cause of this ever-accelerating worldly Fall away from God's Grace, Truth, Love, Justice, Charity, Right-Ordering, Holy Goodness in every dimension, this Fall into Hell.
While in private meditation and prayer I hoped to gain Inspiration and Clarity on the root reasons why this once Christian-virtue value-based Sane Western nation that I remember in early 1970s, how it mutated into today's deformed malignant evil-forming Death-spreading accross the West, and the rest of the world.
This deadly cancerous-expanding; Intellectually, Judgmentally, Rationality and other mental-faculties crippling, and other shockingly damaged that has broken each generation, ever more insane-accepting evil-Blinded Fear-Parallelized Confused Lost soul-weakened feminized God-averting, unwillingness or inability to Sacrifice and Suffer in Service to God, Church, Man, Nation, Family, right-ordering institutions and systems.
In meditation I glimpsed that the evil hand-print of unTrue, unJust, disOrder matching of this increasingly rapid 'damage pattern', similar to the less aggressive damages caused by Sin.
I reviewed Saint Thomas Aquinas' related work and in considering this more aggressive path and it's seeming universality - I theorized that the cause permanently exists and often damages each victim almost always, regardless of the person's intention or activities.
It must be Stopped ASAP, before more significant damage is done. We all should be able to see that the entire West and most of the world suffers from it, and we all are getting worse.
What caused this Spiritual soul-murdering Plague?
If willing sin causes the damages outlined by Saint Aquinas, the Fatherless unProtected insane-accepting mother-raised children, from a very young age are psychologically-disOrdered such that it cements in child an automatic life-long self-harming state, from the crib. Psychologically manipulated and forced to accept insanities, treating them as normal or even praiseworthy.
Raising children from an vulnerable mentally-helpless age with clear insanities; mothers hiring minions to torture-to-death our unborn babies, our brothers and sisters, our uncles, our neighbors, our potential life-long friends, wives, husbands, .. they each silently screaming while being ripped-apart in an act of infinite betrayal of Man, God, herself and the father, Sacrificed to Satan or specific Demons that exchange unHoly powers or unHoly collected information unlimited in time and distance.
Such Betrayal and grave sins is Contempt of God, Contempt of Natural Law, Contempt of family, of community, of self, of Justice, of Love, of right-Order, and Mankind.
Such evil reCasts womanhood and motherhood into Damning forms Called-by-Sin out of Hell, empowered to walk the earth near and in them, That motherhood is transformed from nurturing loving life-supporters with Hands that are Guided by Holy Virgin Mother Mary, demonically changed to Poison Clawed torturers that are Guided by Satan - spreading suffering, torment, murder, horrors, death and Hell.
Both these argument versions in articles referenced below are written so they also may be used to argue against Abortion in perhaps a unique Holy Ghost Inspired manner that breaks the Synagogue-of-Satan contrived unresolvable unmovable focus-locked debate “when is unborn baby granted Personhood rights?”
(This unJust insanity, demonically hijacked and manipulated to the censorship of other forms of argument, and has been suffered through last 50+ years, and uncounted baby-murders world-wide in my lifetime, all while Satanic corporation Dragons are granted Personhood Rights the instant It's demonic Form is Called from Hell, along with the instant legal immunity from Justice for Evils that It's Satanic minion owners Will it to do.)
These arguments in articles below do not address the back-up debate position - that mothers have a 'bodily right' to rid herself of the unintended unborn-baby that is consuming her Body and Blood to live and grow.
This often-used back-up baby-murdering position is a legal debate I hope will go to SCOTUS, be Justly ruled and so be shown as vicious-evil-insane, and then womanhood may finally be Lovingly treated, restricted from legal immunity to murder and instead forced to act like a man and take responsibility for their actions (that risked the pregnancy) and so be forced to carry to birth the unborn person instead of murdering and disposing of them in the trash.
Then maybe Sick Western womanhood will stop acting badly as victims of our generations of insane-society, our unLovingly treatment of them, so they no longer be spoiled self-destructive pathologically broken & abused moral-infants.
“My body, my Choice to risk pregnancy, and if pregnancy follows - than the old murder-choice is no longer available.”
The most significant aspect of my anti-Abortion argument is it's un-linked to any actual unborn babies, the damage from young childhood would continue even if no unborn people were at risk of being tortured-to-death on mother's delusional psychotic whimsy.
1. AI generated audio overview of the Theological-based article;
An important topic and a great read. However, I was taken aback at the use of, or hijacking of, the phrase “concept creep” to specifically mean harm-related concepts. I’m 68yo and in my career that phrase was used for all kinds of things, but never in regard to this topic. So the paper’s opening line ‘“Concept creep” IS the gradual semantic expansion of harm-related concepts such as ...’ totally discredited the team of authors in my view. Or am I just supposed to chill out and watch as the next generation redefines common words and phrases? How about “harm creep”? Now I’m worried if I use the phrase in conversation about a piece of software or a political concept I’m going to get mobbed.
But the greatest cause of verbicide is the fact that most people are obviously far more anxious to express their approval and disapproval of things than to describe them. Hence the tendency of words to become less descriptive and more evaluative; then become evaluative, while still retaining some hint of the sort of goodness or badness implied; and to end up by being purely evaluative -- useless synonyms for good or for bad.
"Those who claim to be hurt by words must be led to expect nothing as compensation. Otherwise, once they learn they can get something by claiming to be hurt, they will go into the business of being offended."
And of a passage in skeptic Michael Shermer's review of Walsh's documentary:
"But [University of Tennessee professor] Grzanka’s dodge is not uncommon in academia today, and in exasperation with Walsh’s persistent questioning in search of the truth, Grzanka pronounces on camera, 'Getting to the truth is deeply transphobic.' ...."
Hard not to see Grzanka's assertion as a suitable epitaph for much of Academia. If "getting to the truth" isn't what Academia is all about then maybe we should burn it to the ground and start over.
"indeed, sometimes the views perceived by some people as offensive might be more aptly described as uncomfortable truths uncovered by rigorous scientific studies"
And some may be truths that are blatantly obvious without the need for any sort of study.
Hi - I'm reposting my comment on a similar post - I thought some may find it useful:
Thanks for the excellent post!
I'll add that the broadening of the concept of harm is not entirely an organic/spontaneous development. It's a result of a concentrated, prolonged effort by various activists-academics, who for decades have indirectly and sometimes underhandedly advocated for its expansion in various academic writings (there are very visible trends in the literature I’m familiar with, in law and philosophy).
This broadening appears to have been directly motivated by the U.S. first amendment doctrine, which maintains that speech is protected unless it causes imminent harm (the incitement exception). So instead of arguing directly for a change in constitutional protections or the law more broadly, these scholars-activists have tried to expand the notion of harm. This has gone along with similar attempts to expand the notion of trauma and other mental health-related concepts, as legal doctrines in many countries have traditionally acknowledged only physical harm and not any form of emotional distress as “harm” for legal purposes, unless it amounts to a medically recognized mental condition; and with attempts to claim that various things are actions and not speech (e.g., that insulting minorities/women is not speech but an act of humiliation/subordination)—because actions are not protected by the first amendment.
All of these attempts have for decades used various technically sophisticated theories and argumentative moves to support those conceptual expansions/conflations, making them appear like good-faith academic inquiry, when in reality much of this is driven by the underlying lawfare. All the while, the application of the concept of harm, for instance, has been very biased and selective – e.g., it’s been used to support only certain efforts that conflict with freedom of expression, while completely ignoring other causes that may be equally supported by the same arguments but are not favored by the relevant scholars/activists, and generally, while ignoring the harms stemming from suppression of free speech.
Yep... those kinds of speech-causes/is-harm arguments usually come with the whole normative apparatus of background assumptions maintaining, e.g., that everyone has some group-based social positioning (the renowned "victimhood hierarchy"), and that only the victimized/marginalized groups can be harmed/subordinated by speech (because other groups have "social power" over them). A set of claims which, in my view, builds on some valid and widely-shared moral intuitions (which makes it appear superficially plausible), but completely misuses them. This is in part to promote political ends, but I suspect that's not the whole story - many people do sincerely buy the entire normative story without qualification. In any case, this too has been long brewing in the literature I mentioned… in my view what's playing out now is, in part, just the spillover of all of that.
The confusion of close personal relationship and the relationship of one with society as a whole is a hallmark of extremist social justice-ism, I think. I too think some of those claims would be appropriate if directed at, say, an abusive partner/parent etc. The whole movement appears to encourage the conflation of the two and perpetuate unhealthy expectations of individuals from society, possibly building on prior interpersonal trauma.
A further Sickening of society, the Hyper-Feminization taken to extremes.
Back in the late 1970s and early 1980s Sanity and basic decent human virtues were everywhere. Society of Trust, men and older mothers were always a blessing to those they interacted with and we men were raised to help and serve others that are having problems - if we could.
Summers in HS years were spent working in farm crews and mutual respect was the rule, for a lot of reasons but under it all was the likelihood that someone rude or disrespecting or publicly humiliating another ran the risk of a simple beating, and if female a good slap of face and "F-you and your cnt father for not doing that when you were just starting to be the psychotic putrid walking sack of poison lies and stall vomit is standing there with a bright red cheek .."
[cut for length]
I lived worked studies socialized with men and women in two States in 3 different regions and I never came across pure-evil in human form, until that Dream Job that grew more man-hating abusive toxic as I struggled in a no-win situation being abused, years later I decided the safest response I could do for self-defense and defense of their next young man torture target would have been to shover her down the cement stairwell and stomp of her neck and hope I didn't get caught. Sad the poisonous hyper-empowered demonic horrors in schools, in workplaces, and in public service jobs ..
Every time I hear of a school, workplace, or public shooting I wonder if he killed that Witch an a few of her minions, any owners or managers that knew or even supported the torment that man most likely suffered.
I'm retired and hopefully soon I will die far away from anyone else so my one Bucket-list item will be completed .. to die without killing anyone.
--
Here is a recent letter I sent to someone in my Church that may be of value to you guys.
Subject 1: Key-Log to end this early Stage of Holy Chastisement, world-wide insanity, evil Blindness and un-Righteousness?
Subject 2: Key-Log that reshapes and wins debate against Abortion in both Theological and Scientific forms?
--
Dear ..,
May this note find us all ever closer to God, and His Clarity.
Pardon this uninvited request for your attention and for any kind feed-back from your review of this, my humble Theological and Worldly offering to God, Church, and Man.
The insanities-accepting evil-blindness world-wide Sickness we are suffering from must be address by Moral and Intellectual powerful forces, and God Willing I pray that a version of this may be Championed by the Church and Her Body of Jesus Christ on earth, uniting all of Her and drawing pagan and lost souls to Her and towards Salvation. Tiny effort for our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, impossible with Him.
If this is as valuable as I hope it will be, perhaps your office's effort in reformatting a version to present to the Vatican, with your co-authorship, to finely drive out the 50+ year-old Satanic foothold on earth and in so many souls - the evil Form from Hell Named Abortion, and in making clear to all the world the reason why and how this wide-spread life-Love-Joy-Hope destroying damage has already crippled generations of people across the world. And that is far far too many.
In this Offering I hope to have addressed the cause of this ever-accelerating worldly Fall away from God's Grace, Truth, Love, Justice, Charity, Right-Ordering, Holy Goodness in every dimension, this Fall into Hell.
While in private meditation and prayer I hoped to gain Inspiration and Clarity on the root reasons why this once Christian-virtue value-based Sane Western nation that I remember in early 1970s, how it mutated into today's deformed malignant evil-forming Death-spreading accross the West, and the rest of the world.
This deadly cancerous-expanding; Intellectually, Judgmentally, Rationality and other mental-faculties crippling, and other shockingly damaged that has broken each generation, ever more insane-accepting evil-Blinded Fear-Parallelized Confused Lost soul-weakened feminized God-averting, unwillingness or inability to Sacrifice and Suffer in Service to God, Church, Man, Nation, Family, right-ordering institutions and systems.
In meditation I glimpsed that the evil hand-print of unTrue, unJust, disOrder matching of this increasingly rapid 'damage pattern', similar to the less aggressive damages caused by Sin.
I reviewed Saint Thomas Aquinas' related work and in considering this more aggressive path and it's seeming universality - I theorized that the cause permanently exists and often damages each victim almost always, regardless of the person's intention or activities.
It must be Stopped ASAP, before more significant damage is done. We all should be able to see that the entire West and most of the world suffers from it, and we all are getting worse.
What caused this Spiritual soul-murdering Plague?
If willing sin causes the damages outlined by Saint Aquinas, the Fatherless unProtected insane-accepting mother-raised children, from a very young age are psychologically-disOrdered such that it cements in child an automatic life-long self-harming state, from the crib. Psychologically manipulated and forced to accept insanities, treating them as normal or even praiseworthy.
Raising children from an vulnerable mentally-helpless age with clear insanities; mothers hiring minions to torture-to-death our unborn babies, our brothers and sisters, our uncles, our neighbors, our potential life-long friends, wives, husbands, .. they each silently screaming while being ripped-apart in an act of infinite betrayal of Man, God, herself and the father, Sacrificed to Satan or specific Demons that exchange unHoly powers or unHoly collected information unlimited in time and distance.
Such Betrayal and grave sins is Contempt of God, Contempt of Natural Law, Contempt of family, of community, of self, of Justice, of Love, of right-Order, and Mankind.
Such evil reCasts womanhood and motherhood into Damning forms Called-by-Sin out of Hell, empowered to walk the earth near and in them, That motherhood is transformed from nurturing loving life-supporters with Hands that are Guided by Holy Virgin Mother Mary, demonically changed to Poison Clawed torturers that are Guided by Satan - spreading suffering, torment, murder, horrors, death and Hell.
Both these argument versions in articles referenced below are written so they also may be used to argue against Abortion in perhaps a unique Holy Ghost Inspired manner that breaks the Synagogue-of-Satan contrived unresolvable unmovable focus-locked debate “when is unborn baby granted Personhood rights?”
(This unJust insanity, demonically hijacked and manipulated to the censorship of other forms of argument, and has been suffered through last 50+ years, and uncounted baby-murders world-wide in my lifetime, all while Satanic corporation Dragons are granted Personhood Rights the instant It's demonic Form is Called from Hell, along with the instant legal immunity from Justice for Evils that It's Satanic minion owners Will it to do.)
These arguments in articles below do not address the back-up debate position - that mothers have a 'bodily right' to rid herself of the unintended unborn-baby that is consuming her Body and Blood to live and grow.
This often-used back-up baby-murdering position is a legal debate I hope will go to SCOTUS, be Justly ruled and so be shown as vicious-evil-insane, and then womanhood may finally be Lovingly treated, restricted from legal immunity to murder and instead forced to act like a man and take responsibility for their actions (that risked the pregnancy) and so be forced to carry to birth the unborn person instead of murdering and disposing of them in the trash.
Then maybe Sick Western womanhood will stop acting badly as victims of our generations of insane-society, our unLovingly treatment of them, so they no longer be spoiled self-destructive pathologically broken & abused moral-infants.
“My body, my Choice to risk pregnancy, and if pregnancy follows - than the old murder-choice is no longer available.”
The most significant aspect of my anti-Abortion argument is it's un-linked to any actual unborn babies, the damage from young childhood would continue even if no unborn people were at risk of being tortured-to-death on mother's delusional psychotic whimsy.
1. AI generated audio overview of the Theological-based article;
https://notebooklm.google.com/notebook/b1015d63-8c29-44b1-8080-8a6a5efce59f/audio
Full article;
"Multiverse Journal - Index Number 2216:, 2nd June 2025, AI Dialog, Best argument against acceptance of Abortion or any evil insanity."
https://stevenwork.substack.com/p/multiverse-journal-index-number-2216
2. AI generated audio overview of my Modern Scientific-based article;
https://notebooklm.google.com/notebook/0483163a-8215-41f4-af6b-3890b9afcf67/audio
Full article;
"Multiverse Journal - Index Number 2218:, 17th June 2025, Modernist best argument against acceptance of Abortion or any insanity"
https://stevenwork.substack.com/p/multiverse-journal-index-number-2218
May God Bless us, and Bless this Inspired Sword against Satan.
I have published other Traditional Catholic Apologetic articles that may also be of some interest.
https://stevenwork.substack.com
Your servant, respectfully in Christ.,
Steven
An important topic and a great read. However, I was taken aback at the use of, or hijacking of, the phrase “concept creep” to specifically mean harm-related concepts. I’m 68yo and in my career that phrase was used for all kinds of things, but never in regard to this topic. So the paper’s opening line ‘“Concept creep” IS the gradual semantic expansion of harm-related concepts such as ...’ totally discredited the team of authors in my view. Or am I just supposed to chill out and watch as the next generation redefines common words and phrases? How about “harm creep”? Now I’m worried if I use the phrase in conversation about a piece of software or a political concept I’m going to get mobbed.
Verbicide
But the greatest cause of verbicide is the fact that most people are obviously far more anxious to express their approval and disapproval of things than to describe them. Hence the tendency of words to become less descriptive and more evaluative; then become evaluative, while still retaining some hint of the sort of goodness or badness implied; and to end up by being purely evaluative -- useless synonyms for good or for bad.
C.S. Lewis, Studies in Words
Reminds me of a quip of Jonathan Rauch:
"Those who claim to be hurt by words must be led to expect nothing as compensation. Otherwise, once they learn they can get something by claiming to be hurt, they will go into the business of being offended."
https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/5539805-those-who-claim-to-be-hurt-by-words-must-be
And of a passage in skeptic Michael Shermer's review of Walsh's documentary:
"But [University of Tennessee professor] Grzanka’s dodge is not uncommon in academia today, and in exasperation with Walsh’s persistent questioning in search of the truth, Grzanka pronounces on camera, 'Getting to the truth is deeply transphobic.' ...."
https://michaelshermer.substack.com/p/what-is-a-woman-anyway
Hard not to see Grzanka's assertion as a suitable epitaph for much of Academia. If "getting to the truth" isn't what Academia is all about then maybe we should burn it to the ground and start over.
"indeed, sometimes the views perceived by some people as offensive might be more aptly described as uncomfortable truths uncovered by rigorous scientific studies"
And some may be truths that are blatantly obvious without the need for any sort of study.
It's gaslighting, really.
Hi - I'm reposting my comment on a similar post - I thought some may find it useful:
Thanks for the excellent post!
I'll add that the broadening of the concept of harm is not entirely an organic/spontaneous development. It's a result of a concentrated, prolonged effort by various activists-academics, who for decades have indirectly and sometimes underhandedly advocated for its expansion in various academic writings (there are very visible trends in the literature I’m familiar with, in law and philosophy).
This broadening appears to have been directly motivated by the U.S. first amendment doctrine, which maintains that speech is protected unless it causes imminent harm (the incitement exception). So instead of arguing directly for a change in constitutional protections or the law more broadly, these scholars-activists have tried to expand the notion of harm. This has gone along with similar attempts to expand the notion of trauma and other mental health-related concepts, as legal doctrines in many countries have traditionally acknowledged only physical harm and not any form of emotional distress as “harm” for legal purposes, unless it amounts to a medically recognized mental condition; and with attempts to claim that various things are actions and not speech (e.g., that insulting minorities/women is not speech but an act of humiliation/subordination)—because actions are not protected by the first amendment.
All of these attempts have for decades used various technically sophisticated theories and argumentative moves to support those conceptual expansions/conflations, making them appear like good-faith academic inquiry, when in reality much of this is driven by the underlying lawfare. All the while, the application of the concept of harm, for instance, has been very biased and selective – e.g., it’s been used to support only certain efforts that conflict with freedom of expression, while completely ignoring other causes that may be equally supported by the same arguments but are not favored by the relevant scholars/activists, and generally, while ignoring the harms stemming from suppression of free speech.
Yep... those kinds of speech-causes/is-harm arguments usually come with the whole normative apparatus of background assumptions maintaining, e.g., that everyone has some group-based social positioning (the renowned "victimhood hierarchy"), and that only the victimized/marginalized groups can be harmed/subordinated by speech (because other groups have "social power" over them). A set of claims which, in my view, builds on some valid and widely-shared moral intuitions (which makes it appear superficially plausible), but completely misuses them. This is in part to promote political ends, but I suspect that's not the whole story - many people do sincerely buy the entire normative story without qualification. In any case, this too has been long brewing in the literature I mentioned… in my view what's playing out now is, in part, just the spillover of all of that.
The confusion of close personal relationship and the relationship of one with society as a whole is a hallmark of extremist social justice-ism, I think. I too think some of those claims would be appropriate if directed at, say, an abusive partner/parent etc. The whole movement appears to encourage the conflation of the two and perpetuate unhealthy expectations of individuals from society, possibly building on prior interpersonal trauma.