The social "sciences" are all just a branch of evolutionary biology. I think they could be massively improved if they would be put on a solid evolutionary basis. but as of right now, the proposed solution of the author is correct

Expand full comment

What? No. Sigh. This is a poor take.

Critiques of social science are as common as mud. I have made many. If you want to make a good one, try these rules:

• don’t say “social scientists concocted laws”without quoting any. In fact, very few social science articles use the idea of a law. Those that do exist, like the Law of Demand, are pretty good, and the exceptions to them are well understood.

• don’t say running social science experiments is “almost always impossible” when there is a massive industry, in both psychology and economics, doing just that. This would’ve been a fair take in the 1980s (if you ignored psychology). Now it’s absurd. They’ve got like, eight Nobels!

• “invoked... teleology”. What? What does this even mean? No one does that.

• don’t say “economists can’t predict anything” until at least you’ve opened an issue of the AER and found the many empirical articles testing and validating theory; or checked out economics’ quite OK performance in replication studies. I’m not saying there are no criticisms, but this is just overblown.

• don’t blame economists for monopolies, trade barriers and price-fixing, when large majorities of economists are persistently against monopolies, trade, barriers and price-fixing.

• don’t say psychology substitutes correlation for causation when almost all academic psychology uses randomised experiments to learn about causation.

There is indeed lots of bad social science, and many valid criticisms of social science. These are not them. And they’re not even funny! Boo.

Expand full comment

Rock on, Castor! Get it said.

Expand full comment

I have thought for years that these people are reading chicken entrails.

Expand full comment

I have thought this sort of thing for years but never had the appropriate mental band width to but voice to these. This essay says a lot...

Expand full comment

I wish I could upvote this twice.

Expand full comment

Fantastic post. Feynman captured the same sentiment comparing social science to pseudoscience.


I love how he humbly concludes his thoughts too "I don't know the world very well, but that's what I think".

Expand full comment